Wait- the biggest economy in
the world should consult two of the smallest to improve its trade management?
When it comes to China, yes.
A. The Numbers
Let’s start with the numbers:
· US- 2017 Trade with China (per US Census website):
Exports: $130.4 billion; Imports: $505.6 billion. Deficit: $375.2 billion (US trade with
China 2017)
· Australia- 2016-17 Trade with China (A$m billion):
Exports: 95.7; Imports 61.5; Surplus 34.2. main export commodities eg., coal
· (Australia Exports to China growth YOY= 27.8% Imports
from China growth YOY=0.0% Australia trade
stats 2017)
· New Zealand- 2016 Trade with China (NZ$ billion):
Exports 12.3; Imports 10.5; Surplus 1.8
· (2017 total trade with China NZ$26.1 billion. Exports
of dairy products increased 52% in 2017 NZ
trade stats 2017)
So what happened here? Does
China need products from Australia and New Zealand more so than those from US?
The US is the #1 agricultural importer to China, far more than either AUS or
NZ. But you cannot but scratch your head when you see that Australia’s exports
to China in 2017 were 73% of those from
the US.
BOTTOM LINE: They MADE A DEAL. We didn’t.
B. The Art of
the Deal vs. Transcontinental Chess
President Trump wrote a book
entitled, “The Art of the Deal.” And nobody can dispute that he has been
successful in business by knowing how to make a deal. But, to me, Australia and
New Zealand management of their trade with China looks more like the art of the
deal than ours-IF judged only by the
result.
So how did they do it? Easier
than you might think, and logical too. Both
countries have a trade deal with China which lowers tariffs and sets a path for
a win-win- New Zealand since 2008, upgraded in 2016, and Australia since 2015.
To my knowledge, the
relationship between the US and China has always been adversarial, and no
president in the past (until Trump) has had the balls to stand up for US
interests OR the smarts to say, hey, China, let’s sit down and explore common
interests and come out with win-win (not Trump yet), THEN apply the leverage if China didn’t respond. So China has had
an open bar for 20 years, got rich and spoiled on it, and cannot (even more
than WILL not) stop the train so easily now without messing with their economy.
In fact, our business
relationship with China seems like an amateur game of chess. Latest round:
Little Move 1 Trump announces tariffs on China; Little Move 2 China announces
tariffs on US; Little Move 3 Little Rocket Man shows up in Beijing. What will be
Little Move 4? What it should be is
for both countries to sit down, cut the BS and cut a trade deal. There is no
doubt that China will not give up its goodies without getting something in
return.
C. What Should We Do?
I believe the US has plenty
to give in order to get a good deal.
First, US is China’s largest
market. No fake news or propaganda can deny that.
Second, there are products
that, for better or worse, are not being made in the US anymore and where China
has a cost advantage; apparel is one of them, sorry y’all who had dreams of
Made in America going back to the good old days. Never.
That does not mean that a viable and vibrant apparel
industry cannot exist in the US-it CAN. It just has to be different than it
used to be. You are not going to stop mass market clothes made in China and
elsewhere from coming; In that area the two countries are codependent. And they
are NOT mutually exclusive.
What’s at the core of the
stasis in US? Local political interests and ethnocentric rhetoric. Shut them up
for the greater good. Change the yahoo attitudes that cling to a Civil War
mentality without a shred of business sense. Most important: get some dang
HUMILITY.
Lower some duties on those
products where we don’t compete anyway. Ask China to lower duties on items they
need and that we want to sell more of.
How much difference will this
make? IDK. I would love to be part of a government project to initiate and
carry out this research. The results might be surprising, but in the least, we
would be conducting ourselves like businesspeople rather than bombastic know-it-alls.
(Above is an extract of a
lesson taught to my Global Marketing class at FIT)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments will be moderated and deleted if they are not relevant (showing you read and understood) the post and commented accordingly; IF you comment and attach your own link in the hopes that someone will click, this violates the purpose of me giving FREE information to the world. Say something relevant or BE DELETED. . This is a blog for people who care about the world situation, not to promote their own businesses.
IF you have nothing to say, say nothing. IF you have anything to say, say anything. IF you want to advertise yourself, pay Google to do so. Your opinion (genuine) will always be published; your insincerity will not. So say something!
IF you have nothing personal to say, say nothing. At least not here.
My issues are relevant to all of you, because I know you: Indonesia, China, Russia, I know all of you. Advertise somewhere else, improve the world HERE.
Feel free to comment, not advertise